public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Enable building defconfigs from Kconfig files
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:22:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C3CCB1C.40206@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100713114322.57c8b166.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On 07/13/2010 03:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After this change, doing a "make xxx_defconfig" will check first for
> a file called arch/<arch>/configs/Kconfig.xxx and use that to generate
> the .config (effectively starting from an allnoconfig).  If that file
> doesn't exist, it will use arch/<ARCH>/configs/xxx_defconfig as now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  scripts/kconfig/Makefile |   14 +++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi Linus,
> 
> Is this more the direction you want to take?
> 
> There are still 2 main problems with is approach:
> 
> 	- there are some config options that are globally and
> unconditionally enabled that some platforms may not want.  The only way
> currently to turn them off is to reproduce the config entry with the
> different default.  I am not sure if we need a wa to turn them off or to
> just change them to being neede to be selected by those that do want them.
> 	- we have no way to select options that are neither bool or
> tristate to suitable values.  Again the only way to do that currently is
> to reproduce the config entry with a different default value.

Hi Stephen,

how are these Kconfig.xxx files going look like? A list of 'select FOO'
 and 'include "Kconfig.other"' statements?

What about adding support for an include statement to the .config file
format and using that in the defconfigs instead? The VARIABLE=VALUE
grammar seems much more suitable for this than the kconfig language.

Michal

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-13 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-13  1:43 [PATCH] kbuild: Enable building defconfigs from Kconfig files Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-13 20:22 ` Michal Marek [this message]
2010-07-14  2:26 ` Grant Likely
2010-07-14  4:04   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-14  5:47     ` Grant Likely
2010-07-14 15:37       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C3CCB1C.40206@suse.cz \
    --to=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox