public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:24:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C3DBA97.40908@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C3DB671.1090802@redhat.com>



Avi Kivity wrote:

>> +
>> +            if (!!is_pae(vcpu) != sp->role.cr4_pae ||
>> +                  is_nx(vcpu) != sp->role.nxe)
>> +                continue;
>> +
>>    
> 
> Do we also need to check cr0.wp?  I think so.

I think it's not too bad since we just decrease the access right, for example,
we mark the mapping readonly for cr0.wp=0's page, the later write-access will
cause #PF, and the read-access is OK.

> 
>>               if (gentry)
>>                   mmu_pte_write_new_pte(vcpu, sp, spte,&gentry);
>>    
> 
> Please move the checks to mmu_pte_write_new_pte(), it's a more logical
> place.
> 
> It means the reserved bits check happens multiple times, but that's ok.
> 

OK

> Also, you can use arch.mmu.base_role to compare:
> 
>     static const kvm_mmu_page_role mask = { .level = -1U, .cr4_pae = 1,
> ... };
> 
>     if ((sp->role.word ^ base_role.word) & mask.word)
>          return;

OK, will update it :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-14 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-13  9:42 [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13  9:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: MMU: cleanup spte update path Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13  9:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: MMU: track dirty page in speculative path properly Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 22:05   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-14  1:24     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14 11:09       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-14 13:18         ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14 14:06           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-14 14:25             ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-15  7:44             ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-15 16:40               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-16  1:58                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14  5:53   ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13  9:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: MMU: remove valueless output message Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 21:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-14  1:08   ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14 13:06 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-14 13:24   ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-07-14 14:27     ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C3DBA97.40908@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox