From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759947Ab0GTUHB (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:07:01 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:53486 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750934Ab0GTUHA (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:07:00 -0400 Message-ID: <4C4601C1.9000201@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:06:25 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo , Denys Vlasenko , Lee Schermerhorn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, numa: fix boot without RAM on node0 again References: <4C45EC59.3030304@kernel.org> <4C45F5F0.8010409@zytor.com> <20100720122831.f1aad864.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20100720122831.f1aad864.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/20/2010 12:28 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > And this patch is missing my patch which fixed up that block comment. > > I'll send both these patches into Linus today. I'm a bit behind due to > various linux-next catastrophies. > > Catastrophies which have been known about for up to a week, yet all the > offending patches are still in linux-next, unaltered. Go figure. > Thank you. -hpa