public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Staging: dt3155: Remove copy_to_user for ioctl's DT3155_{STOP|START}
@ 2010-07-21  0:57 H Hartley Sweeten
  2010-07-21  7:57 ` Jiri Slaby
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2010-07-21  0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel; +Cc: devel, gregkh, ss

The ioctl's DT3155_STOP and DT3155_START are defined with the macro
_IO indicating that they have no parameters. They should not be using
copy_to_user to return data to user space.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Scott Smedley <ss@aao.gov.au>

---

diff --git a/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c b/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
index fed7e62..5eb1bcd 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
@@ -570,8 +570,6 @@ static int dt3155_ioctl(struct inode *inode,
 	  return 0;
 
 	quick_stop(minor);
-	if (copy_to_user(up, dts, sizeof(*dts)))
-	    return -EFAULT;
 	return 0;
       }
     case DT3155_START:
@@ -593,8 +591,6 @@ static int dt3155_ioctl(struct inode *inode,
 	  }
 
 	dt3155_init_isr(minor);
-	if (copy_to_user(up, dts, sizeof(*dts)))
-	    return -EFAULT;
 	return 0;
       }
     default:

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Staging: dt3155: Remove copy_to_user for ioctl's DT3155_{STOP|START}
  2010-07-21  0:57 [PATCH] Staging: dt3155: Remove copy_to_user for ioctl's DT3155_{STOP|START} H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2010-07-21  7:57 ` Jiri Slaby
  2010-07-22 17:55   ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2010-07-21  7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H Hartley Sweeten; +Cc: Linux Kernel, devel, ss, gregkh

On 07/21/2010 02:57 AM, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> The ioctl's DT3155_STOP and DT3155_START are defined with the macro
> _IO indicating that they have no parameters. They should not be using
> copy_to_user to return data to user space.

This is not a reason for removing them. You should check what real users
do/expect and base your reasoning on the top of that.

So could you investigate that?

regards,
-- 
js

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Staging: dt3155: Remove copy_to_user for ioctl's DT3155_{STOP|START}
  2010-07-21  7:57 ` Jiri Slaby
@ 2010-07-22 17:55   ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2010-07-22 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Slaby; +Cc: H Hartley Sweeten, Linux Kernel, devel, ss, gregkh

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:57:16AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 07/21/2010 02:57 AM, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> > The ioctl's DT3155_STOP and DT3155_START are defined with the macro
> > _IO indicating that they have no parameters. They should not be using
> > copy_to_user to return data to user space.
> 
> This is not a reason for removing them. You should check what real users
> do/expect and base your reasoning on the top of that.
> 
> So could you investigate that?

I agree, we can't remove this, it changes the functionality of the
kernel in a way that userspace might not be expecting.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-22 18:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-21  0:57 [PATCH] Staging: dt3155: Remove copy_to_user for ioctl's DT3155_{STOP|START} H Hartley Sweeten
2010-07-21  7:57 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-07-22 17:55   ` Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox