Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the v4l-dvb tree

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>]

Em 26-07-2010 05:24, Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
> 
> On Saturday 24 July 2010 17:32:54 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 13-07-2010 14:23, Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
>>> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 17:34:02 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>>> Em 07-07-2010 12:13, Greg KH escreveu:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 09:34:51AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>>>>> Em 06-07-2010 08:10, Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>>>>> Mauro, can the uvc-gadget patches go through the linux-media tree ?
>>>>
>>>> It will not be simple to fix this conflict from my tree. I tried to
>>>> apply
>>>>
>>>> them against a 2.6.35-rc5, but it failed:
>>>> |diff --git a/drivers/media/video/uvc/uvcvideo.h
>>>> |b/drivers/media/video/uvc/uvcvideo.h index 47b20e7..ac27245 100644
>>>> |--- a/drivers/media/video/uvc/uvcvideo.h
>>>> |+++ b/drivers/media/video/uvc/uvcvideo.h
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------
>>>> No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>>>> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>>>> can't find file to patch at input line 73
>>>> Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>>>
>>> drivers/media/video/uvc/uvcvideo.h has been there for years. Perhaps you
>>> used the wrong -p or --strip option? :-)
>>
>> Doubtful. My scripts apply the patches using -p1. Not sure what happened.
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> Could you please re-send the patch, being sure that it will apply against a
>> -rc kernel?
> 
> The patch I've sent you applies unmodified against 2.6.35-rc6. I'm pretty sure 
> you made a mistake somewhere.

Likely. I've just applied it to my trees. This time, it applied fine.

Cheers,
Mauro.