From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752054Ab0G0RIp (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:08:45 -0400 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:44729 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751382Ab0G0RIo (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:08:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4C4F126B.8050309@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:07:55 -0700 From: Yinghai Lu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100520 SUSE/3.0.5 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bjorn Helgaas CC: Corey Minyard , Andrew Morton , Matthew Garrett , Len Brown , Myron Stowe , openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: Fix ACPI detecting with regspacing References: <4C4E0292.4010004@kernel.org> <201007270934.45683.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <201007270934.45683.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsmt354.oracle.com [141.146.40.154] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090205.4C4F127A.00E1,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/27/2010 08:34 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Monday, July 26, 2010 03:48:02 pm Yinghai Lu wrote: >> >> after the commint that change ipmi_si detecting sequence from SMBIOS/ACPI to ACPI/SMBIOS, >> >> | commit 754d453185275951d39792865927ec494fa1ebd8 >> | Author: Matthew Garrett >> | Date: Wed May 26 14:43:47 2010 -0700 >> | >> | ipmi: change device discovery order >> | >> | The ipmi spec provides an ordering for si discovery. Change the driver to >> | match, with the exception of preferring smbios to SPMI as HPs (at least) >> | contain accurate information in the former but not the latter. >> >> ipmi_si can not be initialized. > > I think this patch makes sense, as long as this is not a bringup > issue that only affects pre-release firmware. If this only affects > a prototype, it would be better to change the firmware so it conforms > to the conventional _CRS usage of systems in the field. > > To that end, I'd like to know what system this is, and whether IPMI > works under Windows on this system. We know that Windows doesn't > look at SMBIOS or SPMI, so if Windows works, it must be doing something > similar to your patch. Sun Fire X4800. Yes. other OSes work and pass certification. Thanks Yinghai