Re: [PATCH] x86: ioremap: fix wrong physical address handling in PAT code

[Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Hi,

Does anybody see the following patch? It's obviously a bug. Please apply it.

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu

> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> The following two commits fixed a problem that x86 ioremap() doesn't handle
> physical address higher than 32-bit properly in X86_32 PAE mode.
> 
> ffa71f33a820d1ab3f2fc5723819ac60fb76080b (x86, ioremap: Fix incorrect physical address handling in
> PAE mode)
> 35be1b716a475717611b2dc04185e9d80b9cb693 (x86, ioremap: Fix normal ram range check)
> 
> But these fixes are not enough, since pat_pagerange_is_ram() in PAT code
> also has a same problem. This patch fixes it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> It is for -tip tree.
> 
> Index: linux-2.6-x86/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-x86.orig/arch/x86/mm/pat.c	2010-07-22 03:04:38.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6-x86/arch/x86/mm/pat.c	2010-07-22 03:47:36.000000000 +0900
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static unsigned long pat_x_mtrr_type(u64
>  	return req_type;
>  }
> 
> -static int pat_pagerange_is_ram(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +static int pat_pagerange_is_ram(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end)
>  {
>  	int ram_page = 0, not_rampage = 0;
>  	unsigned long page_nr;
>