From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ksummit-2010-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: PSA: Please update your flash plugin!
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 17:18:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C558237.1040705@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C524F7A.20505@gmail.com>
On 07/30/2010 07:05 AM, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 07:50 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> This is a public service announcement --- if you are running Flash 10.0,
>> make sure you upgrade to 10.1. Flash 10.0 has a horrible security
>> vulnerability:
>>
>> http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-14.html
>>
>> I have Google Analytics running on the ksummit2010 website, and in
>> addition to discovering that 59% used Firefox and 25% were using Chrome,
>> and that the most popular screen resolution was 1280x800 followed by
>> 1280x1024, etc. --- I also was able to find that while 59% were running
>> Flash 10.1, over 40% of the visitors to the ksummit2010 web site were
>> running a vulnerable version of Adobe flash, which has a remote code
>> execution vulerability.
>>
>> If you were visiting that site from your development system, which you
>> use to push changes to a subsystem maintianer, or even Linus, hopefully
>> I don't need to tell you what a bad idea it is to leave yourself open
>> and vulnerable like this. (This particular security problem with Flash
>> has been announced for almost 2 months at this point!)
>>
>> - Ted
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>
>
> biggest problem here is they havn't updated their x86_64(pure64) version
> yet. hopefully hey release an update soon.
>
> Justin P. Mattock
> --
Here too. How do I run (any) Flash-10.1 on a 64bit system (say FC12) without
actually reverting to a 32bit browser? Do I still get to install half of my
system as 32bit duplicates?
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-01 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-30 2:50 PSA: Please update your flash plugin! Theodore Ts'o
2010-07-30 4:05 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-01 14:18 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2010-08-01 14:17 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2010-08-01 17:53 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-09-16 14:19 ` Justin Mattock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C558237.1040705@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=justinmattock@gmail.com \
--cc=ksummit-2010-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox