From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: MMU: move bits lost judgement into a separate function
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:14:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C567E4C.9030406@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C4E536E.7030109@cn.fujitsu.com>
Introduce spte_has_volatile_bits() function to judge whether spte
bits will miss, it's more readable and can help us to cleanup code
later
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index f7b379a..e18834c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -303,6 +303,20 @@ static u64 __xchg_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
#endif
}
+static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte)
+{
+ if (!shadow_accessed_mask)
+ return false;
+
+ if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte))
+ return false;
+
+ if (spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static void update_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
{
u64 old_spte;
@@ -683,14 +697,14 @@ static void set_spte_track_bits(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
pfn_t pfn;
u64 old_spte = *sptep;
- if (!shadow_accessed_mask || !is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte) ||
- old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask) {
+ if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte))
__set_spte(sptep, new_spte);
- } else
+ else
old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, new_spte);
if (!is_rmap_spte(old_spte))
return;
+
pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
if (!shadow_accessed_mask || old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn);
--
1.6.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-02 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-27 3:31 [PATCH 1/3] KVM: MMU: using kvm_set_pfn_accessed() instead of mark_page_accessed() Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-27 3:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: MMU: move bits lost judgement into a separate function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-27 3:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: MMU: mark page dirty only when page is really written Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-02 7:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-02 7:51 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-02 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 " Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-02 7:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: MMU: move bits lost judgement into a separate function Avi Kivity
2010-08-02 7:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-02 8:14 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-08-02 8:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: MMU: using kvm_set_pfn_accessed() instead of mark_page_accessed() Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-02 9:53 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C567E4C.9030406@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox