public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
	djwong@us.ibm.com, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>,
	Mingming Cao <mcao@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ext4: Don't send extra barrier during fsync if there are no dirty pages.
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:24:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5818A1.9070102@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100630124832.GA1333@thunk.org>

  On 06/30/2010 03:48 PM, tytso@mit.edu wrote:
>
> I wonder if it's worthwhile to think about a new system call which
> allows users to provide an array of fd's which are collectively should
> be fsync'ed out at the same time.  Otherwise, we end up issuing
> multiple barrier operations in cases where the application needs to
> do:
>
> 	fsync(control_fd);
> 	fsync(data_fd);
>

The system call exists, it's called io_submit().

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-03 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-29 23:51 [RFC] ext4: Don't send extra barrier during fsync if there are no dirty pages Darrick J. Wong
2010-05-04  0:57 ` Mingming Cao
2010-05-04 14:16   ` Ric Wheeler
2010-05-04 15:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-30 12:48       ` tytso
2010-06-30 13:21         ` Ric Wheeler
2010-06-30 13:44           ` tytso
2010-06-30 13:54             ` Ric Wheeler
2010-06-30 19:05               ` Andreas Dilger
2010-07-21 17:16             ` Jan Kara
2010-08-03  0:09               ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-03  9:01                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-04 18:16                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-03 13:21                 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-03 13:24         ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-08-04 23:32           ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-05  2:20             ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-05 16:17               ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-05 19:13                 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-08-05 20:39                   ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-05 20:44                     ` Jeff Moyer
2010-05-04 19:49     ` Mingming Cao
2010-06-29 20:51       ` [RFC v2] " Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-05 16:40         ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-05 16:45           ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-06  7:04             ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-06 10:17               ` Ric Wheeler
2010-08-09 19:53               ` [RFC v3] ext4: Combine barrier requests coming from fsync Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-09 21:07                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-16 16:14                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-19  2:07                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-19  8:53                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-19  9:17                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-19 15:48                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-09 21:19                 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-08-09 23:38                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-19  2:14                     ` [RFC v4] ext4: Coordinate fsync requests Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-23 18:31                       ` Performance testing of various barrier reduction patches [was: Re: [RFC v4] ext4: Coordinate fsync requests] Darrick J. Wong
2010-09-23 23:25                         ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-09-24  6:24                           ` Andreas Dilger
2010-09-24 11:44                             ` Ric Wheeler
2010-09-27 23:01                             ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-10-08 21:26                               ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-10-08 21:56                                 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-11 20:20                                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-10-12 14:14                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-15 23:39                                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-10-15 23:40                                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16  0:02                                           ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-10-11 14:33                                 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-18 22:49                                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-10-19 18:28                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-06  7:13           ` [RFC v2] ext4: Don't send extra barrier during fsync if there are no dirty pages Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-06 18:04             ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-09 19:36               ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C5818A1.9070102@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcao@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox