From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935531Ab0HFKvg (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2010 06:51:36 -0400 Received: from 0122700014.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.99.235]:41680 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934475Ab0HFKve (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2010 06:51:34 -0400 Message-ID: <4C5BE936.4060209@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:51:34 +0200 From: Jens Axboe MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Monakhov CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Resend: [PATCH] blkdev: fix blkdev_issue_zeroout return value References: <87vd7o2f9z.fsf@dmon-lap.sw.ru> In-Reply-To: <87vd7o2f9z.fsf@dmon-lap.sw.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2010-08-06 12:42, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > Hi Jens, > Seems that my first mail was missed somewhere. > I've found couple of trivial issues in blkdev_issue_zeroout() > implementation. Unfortunately I've miss during initial testing phase > because always called it with BARRIER|WAIT flags. > OK, I will add this so it can go out with the next pull request. -- Jens Axboe