Re: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server.

["Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>]

On 08/09/2010 03:12 PM, Valeo de Vries wrote:
> On 9 August 2010 22:56, Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On 08/09/2010 02:28 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 21:15 +0300, Mihai Donțu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Wait. I don't think we're on the same page here. I'm talking about
>>>> message
>>>> signing (which does not require the receiving end to have any key - it's
>>>> the
>>>> same plain text e-mail with a blob after it) while you refer to actually
>>>> encrypting the message. Mm? Or am I being extremely slow today? :-)
>>>
>>> Only when you assume that Exchange would pass signed messages without
>>> corrupting them. It really is that broken.
>>>
>>
>> figured the encryption would be kind of a last resort situation..but if it's
>> that broken to where it wont pass it along without corrupting, then the best
>> solution is to figure out what Microsoft needs in terms of encoding, i.e. is
>> there a way to have the scanner scan but not throw everything around after
>> it scans.(if this is what it's doing)
>
> The link I posted earlier seems to give the impression that
> quoted-printable might do that. I may have misread that, though...
>
> Valeo
>


make sense.. Im wondering if it's a simple tell microsoft to scan the 
original email, take the garbled copied email and send out the original 
email rather than updating exchange etc...

Justin P. Mattock