* [PATCH] percpu: use INT_MAX as sentinel value of unit_map
@ 2010-08-10 14:58 Namhyung Kim
2010-08-10 15:07 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2010-08-10 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: linux-kernel
unit_map is a pointer to int so it would be more reasonable to use INT_MAX
as sentinel value.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
---
mm/percpu.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index 6470e77..9581f84 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -1390,7 +1390,7 @@ int __init pcpu_setup_first_chunk(const struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai,
unit_off = alloc_bootmem(nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(unit_off[0]));
for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++)
- unit_map[cpu] = UINT_MAX;
+ unit_map[cpu] = INT_MAX;
pcpu_first_unit_cpu = NR_CPUS;
for (group = 0, unit = 0; group < ai->nr_groups; group++, unit += i) {
@@ -1406,7 +1406,7 @@ int __init pcpu_setup_first_chunk(const struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai,
PCPU_SETUP_BUG_ON(cpu > nr_cpu_ids);
PCPU_SETUP_BUG_ON(!cpu_possible(cpu));
- PCPU_SETUP_BUG_ON(unit_map[cpu] != UINT_MAX);
+ PCPU_SETUP_BUG_ON(unit_map[cpu] != INT_MAX);
unit_map[cpu] = unit + i;
unit_off[cpu] = gi->base_offset + i * ai->unit_size;
@@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ int __init pcpu_setup_first_chunk(const struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai,
pcpu_nr_units = unit;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
- PCPU_SETUP_BUG_ON(unit_map[cpu] == UINT_MAX);
+ PCPU_SETUP_BUG_ON(unit_map[cpu] == INT_MAX);
/* we're done parsing the input, undefine BUG macro and dump config */
#undef PCPU_SETUP_BUG_ON
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] percpu: use INT_MAX as sentinel value of unit_map
2010-08-10 14:58 [PATCH] percpu: use INT_MAX as sentinel value of unit_map Namhyung Kim
@ 2010-08-10 15:07 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-08-10 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namhyung Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel
On 08/10/2010 04:58 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> unit_map is a pointer to int so it would be more reasonable to use INT_MAX
> as sentinel value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Hmmm... yeah unit_map used to be uint. I'd much prefer -1 (which
would actually result in the same code BTW) over INT_MAX tho.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-10 15:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-10 14:58 [PATCH] percpu: use INT_MAX as sentinel value of unit_map Namhyung Kim
2010-08-10 15:07 ` Tejun Heo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox