From: Piotr Hosowicz <piotr@hosowicz.com>
To: piotr@hosowicz.com
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ioctl definition - has it changed recently?
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:11:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6A8A73.1070003@example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C68EFE8.20202@example.com>
On 16.08.2010 09:59, Piotr Hosowicz wrote:
> On 16.08.2010 09:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 16 August 2010 09:11:33 Piotr Hosowicz wrote:
>>>> and then make it use the unlocked_ioctl operation.
>>>
>>> This I do not know. Can You help me?
>>>
>>
>> Just take a look at all the other patches that went into the
>> kernel to do this for other drivers.
I do not know how to find them. :-(
> You only really
>> need to change the line with .ioctl=... to .unlocked_ioctl=
Ok, this is simple.
>> and change the prototype of the referenced function to
>>
>> static long foo_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned
>> long arg)
>
> int nv_kern_ioctl(struct inode *, struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned
> long);
>
> It seems different. How to change it? Now it works, I built it without
> your remarks, exactly how I described on my blog:
>
> http://phosowicz.jogger.pl/2010/08/15/nvidia-graphics-in-fresh-kernels/
Ok, as I wrote the prototypes differ. What should I do with the inode
parameter?
Regards,
Piotr Hosowicz
--
- Za moich czasów to w sklepach był tylko ocet i denaturat!
- Tato, przestań, że w całym Tesco był tylko ocet i denaturat!
NP: -
NB: 2.6.36-rc1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-17 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-14 20:53 ioctl definition - has it changed recently? Piotr Hosowicz
2010-08-14 21:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-08-14 22:10 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-08-16 6:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-16 7:11 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-08-16 7:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-16 7:59 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-08-17 13:11 ` Piotr Hosowicz [this message]
2010-08-17 13:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-17 13:51 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-08-17 13:59 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-08-17 14:33 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-08-14 21:02 ` Piotr Hosowicz
[not found] ` <20100814212007.GA26128@nuttenaction>
2010-08-15 8:24 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-08-15 11:57 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-08-15 14:22 ` Piotr Hosowicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C6A8A73.1070003@example.com \
--to=piotr@hosowicz.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox