From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753277Ab0HRUFJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:05:09 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:36423 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753985Ab0HRUFF (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:05:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4C6C3CBA.8090504@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:04:10 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov CC: Joerg Roedel , "Roedel, Joerg" , "mingo@elte.hu" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "Herrmann3, Andreas" , "Seidel, Conny" , "Sarathy, Bhavna" , "greg@kroah.com" , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, cpu hotplug: Fix cpu bringup concurrency issue References: <4C5AC736.20903@zytor.com> <20100812144142.GY23755@8bytes.org> <4C64148D.5080305@zytor.com> <20100812170644.GZ23755@8bytes.org> <4C644507.9020606@zytor.com> <20100812190414.GA23755@8bytes.org> <20100813123543.GC9046@aftab> <20100816121933.GA28147@aftab> <20100816123959.GC28147@aftab> <4C6C2E85.9050401@zytor.com> <20100818192858.GC12842@aftab> In-Reply-To: <20100818192858.GC12842@aftab> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/18/2010 12:28 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> >> warning: (X86) selects ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE which has unmet direct >> dependencies (HOTPLUG_CPU) > > well I got > > +config ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE > + def_bool y > + depends on HOTPLUG_CPU > > but I guess ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE gets selected still. Why isn't that > "depends on" forcing it, I guess select is stronger. > >> ... and build failure when compiling without CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU. > > This hunk fixes the !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU build here but I should've > caught it earlier, shame on me. Sorry for the inconvenience, can you > please drop this second patch for now, I'll send you a revised version > tomorrow. > I would prefer to not continue to have a piece of Kconfig code which warns, so I'll hold off on this until I have your revised patch. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.