From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751117Ab0HTMAf (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2010 08:00:35 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:50718 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750828Ab0HTMAd (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2010 08:00:33 -0400 Message-ID: <4C6E6DB7.8000403@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:57:43 +0200 From: Michal Marek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100714 SUSE/3.1.1 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Amerigo Wang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Brice Goglin , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch] makefile: not need to regenerate kernel.release file when make kernelrelease References: <20100820094028.6321.95741.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20100820094028.6321.95741.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20.8.2010 11:36, Amerigo Wang wrote: > Brice reported that 'kernelrelease' has a dependence on include/config/kernel.release, > causes this file to be regenerated every time when invoke it. It doesn't have to. > > Reported-by: Brice Goglin > Tested-by: Brice Goglin > Signed-off-by: WANG Cong Thanks, applied. And sorry for breaking your previous patch. Michal