Re: Linux 2.6.35.3

Greg KH
2010-08-21T04:50:15Z

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 09:41:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> OK, I think we can consider this root-caused (it's unclear if it's our
> bug or gcc's, but adding "volatile" to the pointer solves the problem.)
>
> Greg, do you want to take the listed upstream patches (thus bringing the
> code closer to mainline) or do you want to take the one-liner patch from
> the bugzilla? [Attached for reference?]

Let me look at the 2 upstream patches tomorrow, and I'd prefer to take
them instead of something else, just to keep everything in sync.

thanks,

greg k-h