From: Gary King <GKing@nvidia.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_mask parameter for tps6586x_set_bits()
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:58:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C753DB2.3070103@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282730014.2991.155.camel@odin>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1232 bytes --]
Sorry, I must have missed the original e-mail.
I'll give it a try either later today or tomorrow, after I
context-switch back to my dev system that uses the tps6586x driver.
- Gary
On 08/25/2010 02:53 AM, Liam Girdwood wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:09 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:42:42PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> > >> The third parameter of tps6586x_set_bits() is the bit_mask,
> > >> thus we should use (1 << ri->go_bit) instead of ri->go_bit.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > >
> > > but I'd be much happier if someone who actually has the hardware could
> > > verify that this is OK.
> >
> > I don't have the hardware handy at the moment.
> > Gary, can you please verify the fix?
> >
>
> Do we have any news on this testing ? I'd like to have these upstream
> for rc3.
>
> Thanks
>
> Liam
> --
> Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
> ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
> http://www.slimlogic.co.uk
>
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-25 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-22 14:38 [PATCH 1/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix value range checking for val Axel Lin
2010-08-22 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_mask parameter for tps6586x_set_bits() Axel Lin
2010-08-23 10:02 ` Mark Brown
2010-08-23 10:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-08-25 9:53 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-08-25 15:58 ` Gary King [this message]
2010-08-26 21:25 ` Gary King
2010-08-27 13:03 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-08-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix value range checking for val Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C753DB2.3070103@nvidia.com \
--to=gking@nvidia.com \
--cc=axel.lin@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=mike@compulab.co.il \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox