From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753502Ab0IAGiz (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2010 02:38:55 -0400 Received: from dalsmrelay2.nai.com ([205.227.136.216]:13152 "HELO dalsmrelay2.nai.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752209Ab0IAGiw (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2010 02:38:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4C7DF4EF.30109@snapgear.com> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:38:39 +1000 From: Greg Ungerer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Howells CC: Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/22] Fix M68K irqflags References: <20100827015905.27277.39167.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20100827020038.27277.27239.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <4C7B59E1.6010904@snapgear.com> <26799.1283201411@redhat.com> <11403.1283270415@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <11403.1283270415@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Sep 2010 06:38:49.0396 (UTC) FILETIME=[55D74F40:01CB49A0] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/09/10 02:00, David Howells wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> Indeed, m68k doesn't use generic hardirqs yet, m68knommu does. > > That's orthogonal to this patch series, however. I'm dealing with IRQ flags > management, not hardirq support. > > Out of interest, will the m68knommu arch be integrated into the m68k arch at > some point? It's certainly possible to have an arch that is bimodal in this > aspect (FRV has CONFIG_MMU as a config option). At some point it will happen. Steven King sent a script to largely automate for a first pass about a year ago. Regards Greg