From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755479Ab0IBPCH (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:02:07 -0400 Received: from 26.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.27.225]:40572 "HELO 26.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751968Ab0IBPCF (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:02:05 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 399 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:02:04 EDT Message-ID: <4C7FBA71.5040609@example.com> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:53:37 +0200 From: Piotr Hosowicz Reply-To: piotr@hosowicz.com Organization: hosowicz.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100805 Icedove/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: piotr@hosowicz.com CC: Peter Zijlstra , Andrea Arcangeli , Avi Kivity , Thomas Gleixner , Rik van Riel , Ingo Molnar , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , David Miller , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , Nick Piggin , Paul McKenney , Yanmin Zhang , Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] mm: Preemptibility -v4 References: <20100828141637.421594670@chello.nl> <4C7923B4.6030208@example.com> <1283008225.1975.3598.camel@laptop> <4C79287B.9060609@example.com> <1283009031.1975.3615.camel@laptop> <4C7A56BC.6010705@example.com> <4C7D0B72.5050700@example.com> In-Reply-To: <4C7D0B72.5050700@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 13435082115468390770 X-Ovh-Remote: 83.6.192.239 (abbc239.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 31.08.2010 16:02, Piotr Hosowicz wrote: > On 29.08.2010 14:46, Piotr Hosowicz wrote: >> On 28.08.2010 17:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 17:17 +0200, Piotr Hosowicz wrote: >>>>> git remote add mmu_preempt >>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/linux-2.6-mmu_preempt.git >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> git remote update >>>>> git checkout mmu_preempt/mmu_preempt >>>>> >>>>> or >>>>> >>>>> git checkout -b mmu_preempt origin/master >>>>> git pull >>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/linux-2.6-mmu_preempt.git >>>>> >>>>> mmu_preempt >>>> >>>> Which is better? Thanks, I'll try. >>> >>> Fully depends on how you manage your git tree, the first will keep >>> giving you the same tree while the second will try and merge my changes >>> into whatever you got from Linus' tree, which keeps moving fwd and might >>> thus start failing (at which point I'll have to either rebase or >>> backmerge Linus' changes). >> >> I chose the second path, kernel built OK, but then I had to build NVidia >> module and I started Xorg. I logged in and then the screen froze for a >> while, then Kde background went black and I had to hard reset the PC, >> bezcause couldn't switch to VT. I attach my Xorg log. > > Now I had done it the second way you described and everything seems to > be working ok. Still works OK and I perceive that it is better, Peter. Do you know when Linus will be back from Brazil? Regards, Piotr Hosowicz -- Z cyklu "Uroki demokracji", czyli pytania i odpowiedzi w teledurniejach: - Ile kół ma trójkołowiec? - Dwa. NP: Peter Green Splinter Group - Indians NB: 2.6.36-rc3-20100831-1507-pz+