From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752136Ab0ICFNI (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 01:13:08 -0400 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:36804 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750852Ab0ICFNG (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 01:13:06 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 Message-ID: <4C8083D5.200@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:12:53 +0900 From: Koki Sanagi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Weisbecker CC: David Miller , rostedt@goodmis.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, scott.a.mcmillan@intel.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] netdev: show a process of packets References: <4C72422C.5070102@jp.fujitsu.com> <1283212210.3656.84.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4C80592B.2060406@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100902.191741.233696520.davem@davemloft.net> <4C806388.9020509@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100903044656.GA6589@nowhere> In-Reply-To: <20100903044656.GA6589@nowhere> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (2010/09/03 13:46), Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:55:04AM +0900, Koki Sanagi wrote: >> (2010/09/03 11:17), David Miller wrote: >>> From: Koki Sanagi >>> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:10:51 +0900 >>> >>>> Thanks many acks. and I have one question. >>>> >>>> These patches have several component. >>>> >>>> Patch1 is kernel component, but patch2-5 are netdev component. >>>> What tree is good to be included ? >>>> If it is not net-next, I must rebase to another tree. >>> >>> I would prefer it goes into the tracing tree or whatever is the most appropriate >>> for patch #1. >>> >> >> O.K. I'll rebase to linux-2.6-tip. > > > No need, they apply very well :) > > I'll push that to -tip soon. > > Thanks. > O.K. Thanks! Koki Sanagi.