linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	jaxboe@fusionio.com, j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, jamie@shareable.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: make sure FSEQ_DATA request has the same rq_disk as the original
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:28:22 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C80CDC6.8060100@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C80C0D6.4030405@kernel.org>

Hi Tejun,

On 09/03/2010 06:33 PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 09/03/2010 07:47 AM, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
>> By the way, I had been considering a block-layer interface which remaps
>> struct request and its bios to a block device such as:
>> void blk_remap_request(struct request *rq, struct block_device *bdev)
>> {
>> 	rq->rq_disk = bdev->bd_disk;
>>
>> 	__rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq) {
>> 		bio->bi_bdev = bdev->bd_disk;
>> 	}
>> }
>>
>> If there is such an interface and remapping drivers use it, then these
>> kind of issues may be avoided in the future.
> 
> I think the problem is more with request initialization.  After all,
> once bios are packed into a request, they are (or at least should be)
> just data containers.  We now have multiple request init paths in
> block layer and different ones initialize different subsets and it's
> not very clear which fields are supposed to be initialized to what by
> whom.
> 
> But yeah I agree removing discrepancy between request and bio would be
> nice to have too.  It's not really remapping tho.  Maybe just
> blk_set_rq_q() or something like that (it should also set rq->q)?

Thank you for pointing it.
Yes, the interface should also set rq->q.

About the naming of the interface, blk_set_<something> sounds
reasonable to me.
But does blk_set_rq_q() take request and queue as arguments?
Then, I'm afraid we can't find bdev for bio from given queue.

Thanks,
Kiyoshi Ueda

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-03 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-30  9:58 [PATCHSET 2.6.36-rc2] block, dm: finish REQ_FLUSH/FUA conversion, take#2 Tejun Heo
2010-08-30  9:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: make __blk_rq_prep_clone() copy most command flags Tejun Heo
2010-09-01 15:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-30  9:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for bio-based dm Tejun Heo
2010-09-01 13:43   ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 13:50     ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-01 13:54       ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 13:56         ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30  9:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] dm: relax ordering of bio-based flush implementation Tejun Heo
2010-09-01 13:51   ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 13:56     ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-03  6:04   ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-09-03  9:42     ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30  9:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for request-based dm Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 13:28   ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-30 13:59     ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 15:07       ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 19:08         ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-30 21:28           ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-31 10:29             ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-31 13:02               ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-31 13:14                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 15:42       ` [PATCH] block: initialize flush request with WRITE_FLUSH instead of REQ_FLUSH Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 15:45       ` [PATCH UPDATED 4/5] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for request-based dm Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 19:18         ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01  7:15         ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-09-01 12:25           ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-02 13:22           ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-02 13:32             ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-03  5:46             ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-09-02 17:43           ` [PATCH] block: make sure FSEQ_DATA request has the same rq_disk as the original Tejun Heo
2010-09-03  5:47             ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-09-03  9:33               ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:28                 ` Kiyoshi Ueda [this message]
2010-09-03 11:42                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 11:51                     ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-08-30  9:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] block: remove the WRITE_BARRIER flag Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C80CDC6.8060100@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --to=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).