From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
jaxboe@fusionio.com, j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, jamie@shareable.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: make sure FSEQ_DATA request has the same rq_disk as the original
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:28:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C80CDC6.8060100@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C80C0D6.4030405@kernel.org>
Hi Tejun,
On 09/03/2010 06:33 PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 09/03/2010 07:47 AM, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
>> By the way, I had been considering a block-layer interface which remaps
>> struct request and its bios to a block device such as:
>> void blk_remap_request(struct request *rq, struct block_device *bdev)
>> {
>> rq->rq_disk = bdev->bd_disk;
>>
>> __rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq) {
>> bio->bi_bdev = bdev->bd_disk;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> If there is such an interface and remapping drivers use it, then these
>> kind of issues may be avoided in the future.
>
> I think the problem is more with request initialization. After all,
> once bios are packed into a request, they are (or at least should be)
> just data containers. We now have multiple request init paths in
> block layer and different ones initialize different subsets and it's
> not very clear which fields are supposed to be initialized to what by
> whom.
>
> But yeah I agree removing discrepancy between request and bio would be
> nice to have too. It's not really remapping tho. Maybe just
> blk_set_rq_q() or something like that (it should also set rq->q)?
Thank you for pointing it.
Yes, the interface should also set rq->q.
About the naming of the interface, blk_set_<something> sounds
reasonable to me.
But does blk_set_rq_q() take request and queue as arguments?
Then, I'm afraid we can't find bdev for bio from given queue.
Thanks,
Kiyoshi Ueda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-03 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-30 9:58 [PATCHSET 2.6.36-rc2] block, dm: finish REQ_FLUSH/FUA conversion, take#2 Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 9:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: make __blk_rq_prep_clone() copy most command flags Tejun Heo
2010-09-01 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-30 9:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for bio-based dm Tejun Heo
2010-09-01 13:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 13:50 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-01 13:54 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 13:56 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 9:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] dm: relax ordering of bio-based flush implementation Tejun Heo
2010-09-01 13:51 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 13:56 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 6:04 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-09-03 9:42 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 9:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for request-based dm Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 13:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-30 13:59 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 15:07 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 19:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-30 21:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-31 10:29 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-31 13:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-31 13:14 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 15:42 ` [PATCH] block: initialize flush request with WRITE_FLUSH instead of REQ_FLUSH Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 15:45 ` [PATCH UPDATED 4/5] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for request-based dm Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 19:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 7:15 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-09-01 12:25 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-02 13:22 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-02 13:32 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 5:46 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-09-02 17:43 ` [PATCH] block: make sure FSEQ_DATA request has the same rq_disk as the original Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 5:47 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-09-03 9:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:28 ` Kiyoshi Ueda [this message]
2010-09-03 11:42 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 11:51 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-08-30 9:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] block: remove the WRITE_BARRIER flag Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C80CDC6.8060100@ct.jp.nec.com \
--to=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).