public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* pkgtemp: double lock
@ 2010-09-04 11:51 Jiri Slaby
  2010-09-04 17:08 ` Fenghua Yu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2010-09-04 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fenghua.yu; +Cc: Brown, Len, LKML

Hi,

stanse found that you double lock pdev_list_mutex:
  -> pkgtemp_device_remove
    -> mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex);
    -> pkgtemp_device_add
      -> mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex);

Could you fix that?

regards,
-- 
js

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: pkgtemp: double lock
  2010-09-04 11:51 pkgtemp: double lock Jiri Slaby
@ 2010-09-04 17:08 ` Fenghua Yu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fenghua Yu @ 2010-09-04 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Slaby; +Cc: Yu, Fenghua, Brown, Len, LKML

On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 04:51:21AM -0700, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> stanse found that you double lock pdev_list_mutex:
>   -> pkgtemp_device_remove
>     -> mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex);
>     -> pkgtemp_device_add
>       -> mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex);
> 
> Could you fix that?
> 
> regards,
> -- 
> js

I have already sent a patch to lkml to fix the issue. It's not in upstream yet.
I'll will push it to Linus.

>From fenghua.yu@intel.com Wed Aug 18 16:03:04 2010

From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>

When a sibling is added to dev_list after a cpu is hot-removed, pdev_list_m=
utex
has been locked already. But pkgtemp_device_add() tries to lock pdev_list_m=
utex
again. This is incorrect. The patch fixes this issue.

The patch also removes __cpuinit for pkgtemp_device_add() to avoid section
mismatch warning.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c |   18 +++++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c
index 74157fc..928a016 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ struct pdev_entry {
 static LIST_HEAD(pdev_list);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(pdev_list_mutex);
=20
-static int __cpuinit pkgtemp_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
+static int pkgtemp_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	int err;
 	struct platform_device *pdev;
@@ -341,26 +341,34 @@ static void pkgtemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct pdev_entry *p, *n;
 	unsigned int i;
-	int err;
=20
-	mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &pdev_list, list) {
 		if (p->cpu !=3D cpu)
 			continue;
=20
+		mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex);
 		platform_device_unregister(p->pdev);
 		list_del(&p->list);
 		kfree(p);
+		mutex_unlock(&pdev_list_mutex);
+		/*
+		 * Select one of removed cpu's siblings to represent sensor
+		 * for this package.
+		 * If there is no more running sibling in a package, the
+		 * package sensor for this package is not available to user
+		 * space any more.
+		 */
 		for_each_cpu(i, cpu_core_mask(cpu)) {
+			int err;
+
 			if (i !=3D cpu) {
 				err =3D pkgtemp_device_add(i);
 				if (!err)
 					break;
 			}
 		}
-		break;
+		return;
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&pdev_list_mutex);
 }
=20
 static int __cpuinit pkgtemp_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
--=20
1.6.0.3



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-04 17:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-04 11:51 pkgtemp: double lock Jiri Slaby
2010-09-04 17:08 ` Fenghua Yu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox