From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754530Ab0IDRz0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Sep 2010 13:55:26 -0400 Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de ([80.67.29.7]:38022 "EHLO smtprelay03.ispgateway.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754158Ab0IDRzZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Sep 2010 13:55:25 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 440 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 13:55:25 EDT Message-ID: <4C828652.4060804@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 19:48:02 +0200 From: Christian Riesch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: Richard Cochran , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [RFC] posix clock tuning References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Df-Sender: christian@riesch.at Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Richard Cochran wrote: >> Recently on the lkml, we discussed how to allow adjustment of posix >> clocks. I have tried to understand and implement the ideas expressed >> in the various threads. .... > Could you explain why the existing interfaces are not sufficient that do > what you describe? Richard's idea is to support clock hardware for IEEE 1588 (PTP, Precision Time Protocol). Have a look at the earlier discussions: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/16/90 and http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/23/49 Christian