From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754281Ab0IEI0m (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Sep 2010 04:26:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23322 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753470Ab0IEI0k (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Sep 2010 04:26:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4C835434.8080702@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:26:28 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100806 Fedora/3.1.2-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zachary Amsden CC: Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Glauber Costa , Jan Kiszka , Thomas Gleixner , John Stultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [KVM timekeeping] Revert getnsboottime() kernel API References: <1283320624-31262-1-git-send-email-zamsden@redhat.com> <4C81C058.9050105@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4C81C058.9050105@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/04/2010 06:43 AM, Zachary Amsden wrote: > Never got any feedback on this. I don't really have a strong opinion > on it either way, but I'll need to know which way to go with my > rebased patches. Applied it, thanks. > Also nice if we can avoid polluting upstream with unnecessary changes. Yes. > > I believe it would suffice also to revert these two commits: > > 2616ac0be4b12bf31cfe8880a5b21c5a2da7d150 > b8a578a03d18fab78ea1f79886e32c90f1d071a1 > This is what I did. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function