From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756478Ab0IGLC3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 07:02:29 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:62418 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755369Ab0IGLCW (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 07:02:22 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Vivp1ULO79Xt7Vy3zrAq22DZSGeOb0kjzqBOswC1GsL6j+nT9b/s5Wg+zp7zGDHSbI H6XBCsGXno6w/Om/EI/lAQe03wdWyOlf4N9XUZ6iTYPwdoP0118phXcOEB7Ol3QUZfn4 CyhtdfUYDRon7FoIYNIpcvHN2mHK5zAKzlWfg= Message-ID: <4C861BB9.2000707@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:02:17 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; cs-CZ; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 SUSE/3.1.2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Robert Hancock , Matthew Garrett , lenb@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI: pci_irq, add PRT_ quirk for IBM Bartolo References: <1277673679-21458-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> <4C27E965.80508@gmail.com> <4C283D84.6080504@suse.cz> <20100628171410.GA27367@srcf.ucam.org> <4C290245.2040001@suse.cz> <20100628204820.GA32503@srcf.ucam.org> <4C2A3E27.4060407@suse.cz> <4C2B0C73.9050200@suse.cz> <4C3278C8.60503@gmail.com> <4C447D6D.5060801@suse.cz> <4C456C69.60606@suse.cz> <4C737E9F.7060107@gmail.com> <4C7B5F64.30205@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <4C7B5F64.30205@suse.cz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/30/2010 09:36 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 08/25/2010 01:25 AM, Robert Hancock wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> So, to sum up: >>> 1) acpi routing enabled (no kernel parameter) => ports 4+5 defunct. >>> ports 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 11 >>> >>> 2) acpi routing disabled (acpi=noirq) => all ports working, 4+5 on irq >>> 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >>> >>> 3) with the quirk [1] and acpi routing enabled => all ports working, >>> ports 4+5 on irq 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >>> >>> 4) in windows => 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 9 and the ports are all working. >>> >>> Any ideas what this means? Especially point 4)? >>> >>> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/27/85 >> >> I think that's the key question. Is Windows actually using ACPI on >> that machine at all? (Check the computer type in Device Manager and >> see if it mentions ACPI.) > > Yes, there is Computer->ACPI PC. Any ideas here, please? Is there anything what I might try? thanks, -- js