From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751567Ab0IHN1I (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:27:08 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:56545 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750890Ab0IHN1F (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:27:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=aUx0r09dHA5BtRuFAjX4RN20S0U2XzTv0LZZYk+LObDWEGGiBi67Gkcx2R/0NLhs05 KdX4fLkTmY8SnMIYQYQNokQRhQjb6FTJH9PAJnpKeRTnyu2qkmFqxSg8+i82wpfOH69L jlxGlcyCdtRqlHH+w0fD5DnwbiwF4LBu/i1aI= Message-ID: <4C878F24.9010004@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:27:00 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; cs-CZ; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 SUSE/3.1.2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Linux-pm mailing list , LKML Subject: Re: Fan runs full speed after S3 sometimes (regression) References: <4C613619.30309@gmail.com> <4C619CF0.30609@gmail.com> <20100820063107.GB1607@ucw.cz> <4C6E233A.5000209@gmail.com> <20100821170551.GA27159@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20100821170551.GA27159@elf.ucw.cz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi. On 08/21/2010 07:05 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >>>>> I don't know how to debug that. Bisection is out of question -- it >>>>> happens once in 10 or 20 cases. There are no fan entries in /sys. >>> >>> Well, doing 20 suspends in a row from a script should not be too bad. >> >> 20 is just a guess. I haven't seen it for pretty few days until the day >> before yesterday. And it looks like CPU1 is brought up a half way. When >> the fan was at full speed I tried: >> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online >> and whole system freezed. Otherwise this commands succeeds. > > Ok, so this looks like the kernel problem, on the other hand. Two > different problems? Actually, I haven't seen it after an upgrade to the next -mm kernel. Consider it as closed as WORKSFORME for now. thanks anyway, -- js