public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] tcm: Convert to cpu_relax() for atomic_read() in tight loops
@ 2010-09-09 21:29 Nicholas A. Bellinger
  2010-09-10  6:32 ` Jiri Slaby
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger @ 2010-09-09 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-scsi, linux-kernel
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, FUJITA Tomonori, Mike Christie,
	Hannes Reinecke, James Bottomley, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk,
	Boaz Harrosh, Richard Sharpe, Nicholas Bellinger

From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>

Greetings all,

This patch converts the following functions from within shutdown and release
path code to use cpu_relax() instead of msleep() while doing atomic_read() in
a tight loop waiting for various PR and MIB reference count(s) to return to zero:

	*) core_update_device_list_for_node() + struct se_dev_entry->pr_ref_count
	*) core_release_port() + struct se_port->sep_tg_pt_ref_cnt
	*) se_dev_stop() + struct se_hba->dev_mib_access_count
	*) __core_scsi3_free_registration() + struct t10_pr_registration->pr_res_holders
	*) core_tpg_wait_for_nacl_pr_ref() + struct se_node_acl->acl_pr_ref_count
	*) core_tpg_wait_for_mib_ref() + struct se_node_acl->mib_ref_count
	*) core_tpg_deregister() + struct se_portal_group->tpg_pr_ref_count
	*) transport_deregister_session() + struct se_session->mib_ref_count

Thanks to Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk for mentioning cpu_relax() usage!

Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
---
 drivers/target/target_core_device.c    |    6 +++---
 drivers/target/target_core_pr.c        |    2 +-
 drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c       |    6 +++---
 drivers/target/target_core_transport.c |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
index 665b8e2..459f0f8 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ int core_update_device_list_for_node(
 	 */
 	spin_unlock_irq(&nacl->device_list_lock);
 	while (atomic_read(&deve->pr_ref_count) != 0)
-		msleep(100);
+		cpu_relax();
 	spin_lock_irq(&nacl->device_list_lock);
 	/*
 	 * Disable struct se_dev_entry LUN ACL mapping
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ void core_release_port(struct se_device *dev, struct se_port *port)
 	 */
 	spin_unlock(&dev->se_port_lock);
 	if (atomic_read(&port->sep_tg_pt_ref_cnt))
-		msleep(100);
+		cpu_relax();
 	spin_lock(&dev->se_port_lock);
 
 	core_alua_free_tg_pt_gp_mem(port);
@@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ void se_dev_stop(struct se_device *dev)
 	spin_unlock(&hba->device_lock);
 
 	while (atomic_read(&hba->dev_mib_access_count))
-		msleep(10);
+		cpu_relax();
 }
 
 int se_dev_check_online(struct se_device *dev)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
index 2cebafa..11118fb 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
@@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ static void __core_scsi3_free_registration(
 		spin_unlock(&pr_tmpl->registration_lock);
 		printk("SPC-3 PR [%s] waiting for pr_res_holders\n",
 				tfo->get_fabric_name());
-		msleep(10);
+		cpu_relax();
 		spin_lock(&pr_tmpl->registration_lock);
 	}
 
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
index 75c3900..e598f2b 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
@@ -315,13 +315,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(core_tpg_check_initiator_node_acl);
 void core_tpg_wait_for_nacl_pr_ref(struct se_node_acl *nacl)
 {
 	while (atomic_read(&nacl->acl_pr_ref_count) != 0)
-		msleep(100);
+		cpu_relax();
 }
 
 void core_tpg_wait_for_mib_ref(struct se_node_acl *nacl)
 {
 	while (atomic_read(&nacl->mib_ref_count) != 0)
-		msleep(100);
+		cpu_relax();
 }
 
 void core_tpg_clear_object_luns(struct se_portal_group *tpg)
@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ int core_tpg_deregister(struct se_portal_group *se_tpg)
 	spin_unlock_bh(&se_global->se_tpg_lock);
 
 	while (atomic_read(&se_tpg->tpg_pr_ref_count) != 0)
-		msleep(100);
+		cpu_relax();
 
 	if (se_tpg->se_tpg_type == TRANSPORT_TPG_TYPE_NORMAL)
 		core_tpg_release_virtual_lun0(se_tpg);
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
index 9e7582b..95401cb 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
@@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ void transport_deregister_session(struct se_session *se_sess)
 	 * scsi_att_intr_port_seq_show()
 	 */
 	while (atomic_read(&se_sess->mib_ref_count) != 0)
-		msleep(100);
+		cpu_relax();
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&se_tpg->session_lock);
 	list_del(&se_sess->sess_list);
-- 
1.5.6.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] tcm: Convert to cpu_relax() for atomic_read() in tight loops
  2010-09-09 21:29 [PATCH] tcm: Convert to cpu_relax() for atomic_read() in tight loops Nicholas A. Bellinger
@ 2010-09-10  6:32 ` Jiri Slaby
  2010-09-10 19:13   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2010-09-10  6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nicholas A. Bellinger
  Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel, Christoph Hellwig, FUJITA Tomonori,
	Mike Christie, Hannes Reinecke, James Bottomley,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Boaz Harrosh, Richard Sharpe

On 09/09/2010 11:29 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> 
> Greetings all,
> 
> This patch converts the following functions from within shutdown and release
> path code to use cpu_relax() instead of msleep() while doing atomic_read() in
> a tight loop waiting for various PR and MIB reference count(s) to return to zero:
> 
> 	*) core_update_device_list_for_node() + struct se_dev_entry->pr_ref_count
> 	*) core_release_port() + struct se_port->sep_tg_pt_ref_cnt
> 	*) se_dev_stop() + struct se_hba->dev_mib_access_count
> 	*) __core_scsi3_free_registration() + struct t10_pr_registration->pr_res_holders
> 	*) core_tpg_wait_for_nacl_pr_ref() + struct se_node_acl->acl_pr_ref_count
> 	*) core_tpg_wait_for_mib_ref() + struct se_node_acl->mib_ref_count
> 	*) core_tpg_deregister() + struct se_portal_group->tpg_pr_ref_count
> 	*) transport_deregister_session() + struct se_session->mib_ref_count
> 
> Thanks to Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk for mentioning cpu_relax() usage!
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> ---
>  drivers/target/target_core_device.c    |    6 +++---
>  drivers/target/target_core_pr.c        |    2 +-
>  drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c       |    6 +++---
>  drivers/target/target_core_transport.c |    2 +-
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> index 665b8e2..459f0f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ int core_update_device_list_for_node(
>  	 */
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&nacl->device_list_lock);
>  	while (atomic_read(&deve->pr_ref_count) != 0)
> -		msleep(100);
> +		cpu_relax();
>  	spin_lock_irq(&nacl->device_list_lock);
>  	/*
>  	 * Disable struct se_dev_entry LUN ACL mapping

Why would you want to convert those to busy-waiting? This should rather
be converted to wait_event/wake_up, right?

thanks,
-- 
js

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] tcm: Convert to cpu_relax() for atomic_read() in tight loops
  2010-09-10  6:32 ` Jiri Slaby
@ 2010-09-10 19:13   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger @ 2010-09-10 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Slaby
  Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel, Christoph Hellwig, FUJITA Tomonori,
	Mike Christie, Hannes Reinecke, James Bottomley,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Boaz Harrosh, Richard Sharpe

On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 08:32 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 09/09/2010 11:29 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> > 
> > Greetings all,
> > 
> > This patch converts the following functions from within shutdown and release
> > path code to use cpu_relax() instead of msleep() while doing atomic_read() in
> > a tight loop waiting for various PR and MIB reference count(s) to return to zero:
> > 
> > 	*) core_update_device_list_for_node() + struct se_dev_entry->pr_ref_count
> > 	*) core_release_port() + struct se_port->sep_tg_pt_ref_cnt
> > 	*) se_dev_stop() + struct se_hba->dev_mib_access_count
> > 	*) __core_scsi3_free_registration() + struct t10_pr_registration->pr_res_holders
> > 	*) core_tpg_wait_for_nacl_pr_ref() + struct se_node_acl->acl_pr_ref_count
> > 	*) core_tpg_wait_for_mib_ref() + struct se_node_acl->mib_ref_count
> > 	*) core_tpg_deregister() + struct se_portal_group->tpg_pr_ref_count
> > 	*) transport_deregister_session() + struct se_session->mib_ref_count
> > 
> > Thanks to Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk for mentioning cpu_relax() usage!
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/target/target_core_device.c    |    6 +++---
> >  drivers/target/target_core_pr.c        |    2 +-
> >  drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c       |    6 +++---
> >  drivers/target/target_core_transport.c |    2 +-
> >  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> > index 665b8e2..459f0f8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> > @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ int core_update_device_list_for_node(
> >  	 */
> >  	spin_unlock_irq(&nacl->device_list_lock);
> >  	while (atomic_read(&deve->pr_ref_count) != 0)
> > -		msleep(100);
> > +		cpu_relax();
> >  	spin_lock_irq(&nacl->device_list_lock);
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Disable struct se_dev_entry LUN ACL mapping
> 
> Why would you want to convert those to busy-waiting? This should rather
> be converted to wait_event/wake_up, right?

Hi Jiri,

I agree that this is the one scenario within the msleep() -> cpu_relax()
conversion patch that involves something besides a simple shortly held
'non CDB I/O emulation path context ref/deref', and might probably be
better served by using wait_event/wake_up.

I will take a look at a conversion to use wait_queue_head_t in the near
future.

Thanks for your comments Jiri!

--nab



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-10 19:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-09 21:29 [PATCH] tcm: Convert to cpu_relax() for atomic_read() in tight loops Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-10  6:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-09-10 19:13   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox