public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net, eranian@gmail.com,
	robert.richter@amd.com, acme@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] perf_events: add support for per-cpu per-cgroup monitoring (v3)
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:41:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C89EF37.5080803@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284106566.402.26.camel@laptop>

Hello,

On 09/10/2010 10:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 23:41 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>> alloc_percpu() is zalloc_percpu() in fact, memory is already cleared.
>>>
>> I remember thinking about this and trying to trace to the code down
>> to figure this out. But it is rather complicated. If alloc_percpu() always
>> clears the memory, then I think that calling is zalloc_percpu()
>> would be more helpful.... 

Maybe but at this point it might be a bit too late.  The allocator has
been that way since the beginning.

> pcpu_populate_chunk() in mm/percpu-vm.c does indeed do that memset, the
> one in mm/percpu-km.c does not.
> 
> It is not obviously clear to me the -km allocator does indeed result in
> zero filled memory.

Nice catch.  Fortunately, the -km allocator isn't currently being used
in upstrea although it was enabled for linux-next a couple of days
ago.  I'll fix it up.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-10  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-09 13:09 [RFC PATCH 1/2] perf_events: add support for per-cpu per-cgroup monitoring (v3) Stephane Eranian
2010-09-09 13:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-09 21:41   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-10  8:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-10  8:41       ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-09-10  8:52         ` [PATCH percpu#for-next] percpu: clear memory allocated with the km allocator Tejun Heo
2010-09-10  8:55           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-10 16:31             ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-10 16:45               ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-10 23:28                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-10  8:59         ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] perf_events: add support for per-cpu per-cgroup monitoring (v3) Stephane Eranian
2010-09-10  9:03           ` [PATCH] percpu: update comments to reflect that percpu allocations are always zero-filled Tejun Heo
2010-09-10  9:07             ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-10  9:09             ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C89EF37.5080803@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eranian@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox