From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751842Ab0IKShj (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:37:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:43227 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751249Ab0IKShi (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:37:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uL9/aGrR+FKFdFm8n3nlRfW+52xZsxSBYJFUfhi5Ugjij8I/21jqVXkqi7u4KX0397 ZPUWNgDyxRLvMmFwqBQBgcEJhihGGU98mBa35QXNGdYiQ4cm+hPtF3rF9REs/1zK7bKD dYhYOdT67KP8mizcpmljhzAJU0BE+KaBhnF14= Message-ID: <4C8BCC98.4070506@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:38:16 -0700 From: "Justin P. Mattock" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0b5pre) Gecko/20100827 Thunderbird/3.2a1pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Randy Dunlap CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: git crapps out with {kernel_version}/usr/include References: <4C8BB4F3.3040907@gmail.com> <20100911110050.1c6f275c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <20100911110050.1c6f275c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/11/2010 11:00 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:57:23 -0700 Justin P. Mattock wrote: > >> finishing up with looking at broken web addresses Im noticing that >> usr/include/* seems to not work with git i.e. theres a couple of broken >> addresses in there after changing them, then using git commit -s -a >> gives me the "nothing to commit message".. >> why is this? > > usr/include/* is all generated files from elsewhere in the kernel tree, > so you should just change the original files, not the generated ones. > > --- > ~Randy > *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** > yeah.. that's what I just realized.. then in this case it's probably fixed then... as for the rest I went through most of all the directories(keep in mind only http, didn't check www nor any other protocol) only a few files in the source tree are left(MAINTAINERS, etc...) so now the kernel to the most part has working web addresses.. This is what happens when I challenge myself... Justin P. Mattock