From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754712Ab0INRry (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:47:54 -0400
Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.128.226]:59670 "EHLO
	bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752995Ab0INRrx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:47:53 -0400
Message-ID: <4C8FB424.8010508@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:43:00 +0100
From: Ian Molton <ian.molton@collabora.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100805 Icedove/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Buffer allocation question
References: <4C8E4898.7090407@collabora.co.uk> <4C8F1BC8.4010201@ladisch.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C8F1BC8.4010201@ladisch.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 14/09/10 07:52, Clemens Ladisch wrote:

<>

Thanks!

I've decided to go for a fixed-buffer scheme in the end.

-Ian