From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756681Ab0ITPLR (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:11:17 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:36965 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756632Ab0ITPLQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:11:16 -0400 Message-ID: <4C977979.2060301@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:10:49 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , x86 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, cpuid: Unbreak CPB CPUID feature References: <20100920140521.GA4823@aftab> In-Reply-To: <20100920140521.GA4823@aftab> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/20/2010 07:05 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > 5958f1d5d722df7a9e5d129676614a8e5219bacd added mistakenly the CPB bit to > the common scattered CPUID features. Move it to AMD-only code where it > belongs. I already asked for more information about this. This patch, without a further description, makes absolutely no sense, and is furthermore implemented poorly -- I really don't want more ad hoc code if it can be avoided. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.