From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] floppy: switch to one queue per drive instead of sharing a queue (Was: Re: cgq vs bdi names, was "cfq-iosched: fix a kernel OOPs when usb key is inserted")
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:17:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C992F12.5090000@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100921182529.GA31132@redhat.com>
On 2010-09-21 20:25, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:30:01PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:12:44PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 2010-09-20 15:03, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> Hi Vivek, hi Jens,
>>>>
>>>> where was http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=44c74d6292e97f8bd9adfa6b0df3cb4f3c42a6dc posted on the mailinglist?
>>>>
>>>> I can't find it in my lkml or fsdevel inboxes. Either way I don't think
>>>> just papering over the underlying issue like this is a good idea.
>>>>
>>>> The big issue is that cfq tries to scanf the textual representation of
>>>> the dev_t from the request_queue by abusing the bdi. But the reason why
>>>> we don't have a dev_t in the request_queue is that it's still not
>>>> unique. If it was we could easily add a dev_t into the request_queue
>>>> and be done with it.
>>>>
>>>> So the fix is either to get rid of the last remaining users of shared
>>>> request_queues (IIRC the various floppy drivers) and just add a dev_t
>>>> in the request_queue for the bdi, tracing and cfq, or add a dev_t into
>>>> the request_queue and add a flag for shared request queues that the
>>>> floppy driver and whoever needs it set and let the bdi sysfs code, cfq
>>>> and blocktrace ignore theis request_queue. This will also allow to
>>>> get rid of the crap about ignoring failures due to already register
>>>> or prematurely unregistered bdis and actually add real error handling
>>>> to that code.
>>>
>>> I did this one 15 months ago (according to git), but I never got it
>>> tested:
>>>
>>> http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commitdiff;h=7a0ebc7ea1db42a71841df6a15be9fd420fae980
>>>
>>> IIRC, the mtd stuff also uses a shared queue. But I think that is it.
>>> Would indeed be VERY nice to finally get rid of that crap, it has
>>> technically been outlawed since 2.5.1.
>>
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> I have refreshed your patch to apply on latest tree. I did testing with
>> one floppy controller and it was hanging because we were taking
>> floppy_lock both inside and outside of function set_next_request(). I got
>> rid of that and now atleast with one flopply controller this patch is
>> working fine.
>>
>> I tried connecting another floppy controller to see if I see two request
>> queues being registered, but somehow my BIOS does not recognize two
>> floppy controllers and only makes one of these operational.
>>
>
> Christoph suggested to use qemu and test with multiple flopply disk
> controller and it worked. Thanks Christoph.
>
> I exported two floppy disks and they show up as /dev/fd0 and /dev/fd1 in
> the guest.
>
> With the patch I also verified that changing IO scheduler on fd0 does
> not change it automatically for fd1. That means they both are using
> separate requests queues after the patch. Without the patch changing
> IO scheduler on one changed it automatically for the other controller
> meaning they were sharing same request queue.
>
> I did basic testing of being able to mount the floppy disks and being
> able to read/write simple text files.
>
> Jens, do let me know if you are curious to know about test results in
> some other configuration.
Super, thanks a lot! I will queue this up. If you want to continue
this (very noble) crusade, the next target is
drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c. I never got that one started, but it was
next on my list.
I will queue up the floppy patch for .37.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-21 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-20 13:03 cgq vs bdi names, was "cfq-iosched: fix a kernel OOPs when usb key is inserted" Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-20 13:12 ` Jens Axboe
2010-09-20 22:30 ` [PATCH] floppy: switch to one queue per drive instead of sharing a queue (Was: Re: cgq vs bdi names, was "cfq-iosched: fix a kernel OOPs when usb key is inserted") Vivek Goyal
2010-09-21 18:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-09-21 22:17 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-09-22 20:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-09-23 7:59 ` Jens Axboe
2010-09-23 8:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-23 21:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-09-20 13:32 ` cgq vs bdi names, was "cfq-iosched: fix a kernel OOPs when usb key is inserted" Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C992F12.5090000@fusionio.com \
--to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox