From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754259Ab0IVLgk (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:36:40 -0400 Received: from cluster-g.mailcontrol.com ([208.87.233.190]:37422 "EHLO cluster-g.mailcontrol.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754180Ab0IVLgj (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:36:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4C99EA3D.7050405@csr.com> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:36:29 +0100 From: David Vrabel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vasiliy Kulikov CC: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] uwb: fix device_register() error handling References: <1284900918-24770-1-git-send-email-segooon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1284900918-24770-1-git-send-email-segooon@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2010 11:36:30.0171 (UTC) FILETIME=[665E0AB0:01CB5A4A] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > If device_register() fails then call put_device(). > See comment to device_register. > > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov Acked-by: David Vrabel What's the preferred way of handling these sorts of patch sets? Merged via some kernel-janitor tree or is it expected that subsystem maintainers pick up the individual patches? David -- David Vrabel, Senior Software Engineer, Drivers CSR, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Tel: +44 (0)1223 692562 Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ http://www.csr.com/ Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom