From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Josh Hill <joshua.hill@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
alan@redhat.com, stable@kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.35-rc5] hp-wmi patch missed .35 merge window, requesting addition to next rc
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:25:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9B1D22.20504@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009231037.09097.trenn@suse.de>
On 09/23/2010 10:37 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I didn't know about this one.
> Can people please add me to CC list on hp-wmi specific bug
> reports (for existing and new ones), thanks.
>
> On Wednesday 22 September 2010 04:08:16 Andrew Morton wrote:
>> (cc's added)
>> The suggestion is that mainline's
>> 751ae808f6b29803228609f51aa1ae057f5c576e ("x86 platform drivers: hp-wmi
>> Reorder event id processing") be backported into 2.6.35.x to fix the
>> post-2.6.32 regression described in
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15344
> Hmm, the bug is still in "open" state, there is no statement that anything
> is found yet fixing the issue.
>
> Could you please update the bug report if you verified and are sure
> the patch helps.
>
> The patch is a cleanup, has some functional change, but should
> do things correctly now. As long as no special case was handled
> by always calling:
> hp_wmi_get_entry_by_scancode(eventcode);
> even it was not a hotkey event, this is a straight forward fix and
> if no one else complains, you have my vote for adding this to
> stable kernel(s).
>
> about:
>> if this patch doesn't make it into .35 my laptop
>> will be doing this for its (10.10) entire lifetime.
> Isn't Ubuntu following stable 2.6.35.X kernels and you would get this with
> an update if it's pushed into stable kernels?
> I expect they do follow and there is no need to hurry?
>
Yes, we do follow 2.6.35.y updates at least for a few months after release. So
there should be no particular need to hurry. At least if it gets to Greg before
he stops caring about .35.
-Stefan
> Thomas
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-23 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-21 17:23 [2.6.35-rc5] hp-wmi patch missed .35 merge window, requesting addition to next rc Josh Hill
2010-09-22 2:08 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-23 8:37 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-09-23 9:25 ` Stefan Bader [this message]
2010-09-23 18:00 ` [stable] " Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C9B1D22.20504@canonical.com \
--to=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=joshua.hill@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox