From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751478Ab0I2OuX (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:50:23 -0400 Received: from mailrelayi.jaist.ac.jp ([150.65.19.7]:56187 "EHLO mailrelayi.jaist.ac.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750898Ab0I2OuW (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:50:22 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 615 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:50:22 EDT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,253,1283698800"; d="scan'208";a="85746390" Message-ID: <4CA34F95.30400@logic.at> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:39:17 +0900 From: Norbert Preining User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100917 Icedove/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alex,Shi" CC: Peter Zijlstra , "Chen, Tim C" , "arjan@infradead.org" , "efault@gmx.de" , "Li, Shaohua" , tglx , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , yakui.zhao@intel.com Subject: Re: high power consumption in recent kernels References: <1284355277.26157.8109.camel@debian> <1284689374.17745.89.camel@debian> <1283840425.26157.6486.camel@debian> <20100909093140.GC29648@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <20100909205115.GD11053@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <1284107099.402.30.camel@laptop> <6E3BC7F7C9A4BF4286DD4C043110F30B2991AF14FD@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20100910145451.GB21450@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <1284355277.26157.8109.camel@debian> <20100922154452.GA9080@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <1285670426.21962.43.camel@debian> In-Reply-To: <1285670426.21962.43.camel@debian> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alex, > Could you like to try the following patch on your system and see how > many power it consumption now? But this patch is excately what you send me already and what I tried and I answered in the last email? Do I miss something here? All the best Norbert