From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932338Ab0JEG5l (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2010 02:57:41 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:34909 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932276Ab0JEG5j (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2010 02:57:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4CAACCC1.6000000@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 08:59:13 +0200 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the lost-spurious-irq tree with the tip tree References: <20101005141334.6a0f15fd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4CAABC0E.3030700@kernel.org> <20101005063227.GB12267@elte.hu> <4CAACBDA.6090308@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <4CAACBDA.6090308@kernel.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:57:07 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/05/2010 08:55 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > I think Stephen had done enough. At the time, I wasn't sure which > tree it was going to go through and it took some time before Thomas > responded, so I was intending to push it through separately. I should > have retracted the tree right after it was determined to be > reimplemented but forgot. That's my mistake not Stephen's. Sorry > about that. Oooh, apparently I knew it was gonna go through genirq but expected it to go through as-is and wanted to accelerate testing. FWIW, I'm sure everyone involved was notified of the move at the time. At any rate, won't happen again. Thanks. -- tejun