From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758379Ab0JFDF6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:05:58 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:50653 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752190Ab0JFDF5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:05:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4CABE739.8050001@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:04:25 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Organization: Linux Kernel Organization, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yinghai Lu CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , LKML Subject: Re: Section mismatches in memblock References: <4CABAAB4.3090707@zytor.com> <4CABB4FD.2090304@kernel.org> <4CABDF3A.2020501@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4CABDF3A.2020501@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/05/2010 07:30 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Wrong functions! Furhtermore, at least the tip tree definitely does not > have __init_memblock here: > Nevermind. I had missed that Ingo had put stuff into core/memblock on top of x86/memblock, just to be confusing. -hpa