Re: [PATCH 1/5] jump label: fix module __init section race

[Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>]

(2010/10/07 0:46), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:41 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 09:00:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:58 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>>
>>>>> +static void remove_module_init(struct module *mod)
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jason,
>>>>
>>>> Just a comment, I prefer remove_jump_label_module_init() than this name,
>>>> because remove_module_init is too general.
>>>
>>> This is probably not too big of a deal since it is static, but the name
>>> change may make it easier for etags and ctags users.
>>>
>>> Jason, are you OK if I pull in this patch and make the change myself?
>>>
>>> -- Steve
>>>
>>
>> fine with me. I had a more specific function name and then shortened it
>> because it seemed too long, either way is fine with me.
>>
> 
> Maybe call it jl_remove_module_init()?  For static functions, I usually
> use abbreviations. As long as it isn't too confusing.
> 

Ah, that's fine for me too :)

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
2nd Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com