From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757746Ab0JHNvp (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2010 09:51:45 -0400 Received: from newsmtp5.atmel.com ([204.2.163.5]:31613 "EHLO sjogate2.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753628Ab0JHNvo (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2010 09:51:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4CAF21CE.5000901@atmel.com> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:51:10 +0200 From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: atmel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Anders Larsen , Russell King - ARM Linux CC: Andrew Victor , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: AT91: Fix power-saving in idle-mode on 926T processors References: <20101007194415.GA24709@alarsen.net> <20101008122918.GA30252@game.jcrosoft.org> In-Reply-To: <20101008122918.GA30252@game.jcrosoft.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Russell, Le 08/10/2010 14:29, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD : > On 21:44 Thu 07 Oct , Anders Larsen wrote: >> According to Atmel, their 926T processors (AT91 post RM9200) requires >> 'Wait for Interrupt' mode be entered right after disabling the processor clock >> in order to minimise current consumption when idle, so do both provided we're >> not running on a 920T (an RM9200). >> >> Furthermore, get rid of the #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, since arch_idle() >> can be turned off completely with the kernel parameter 'nohlt'. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen >> Cc: Andrew Victor > please rebase against this branch > > git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git branch for-rmk This patch seems already in your "master" branch (5c189208b606a85b4e97109af70d59f10a42fdfd). Do you want me to rebase this patch or do you mange merging with "AT91: fix use of clock disable on idle for AT91x40 devices" (cb809b1a5ebffca8cf0314b788919989e8e4ab5f) ? already in your "devel" and "devel-stable" branches? Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre