From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752136Ab0JKSi1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:38:27 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:56300 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751769Ab0JKSi0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:38:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4CB35973.3070100@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:37:39 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yinghai Lu CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4] x86: Setup early console as early as possible in x86_start_kernel() References: <4CB35050.7060207@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <4CB35050.7060207@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/11/2010 10:58 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_TRAMPOLINE > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c > @@ -74,6 +74,10 @@ void __init x86_64_start_kernel(char * r > /* clear bss before set_intr_gate with early_idt_handler */ > clear_bss(); > > + /* boot_params is in bss */ > + copy_bootdata(__va(real_mode_data)); > + setup_early_console(); > + > /* Make NULL pointers segfault */ > zap_identity_mappings(); > > @@ -97,7 +101,14 @@ void __init x86_64_start_kernel(char * r > > void __init x86_64_start_reservations(char *real_mode_data) > { > - copy_bootdata(__va(real_mode_data)); > + /* > + * hdr.version is always not 0, so check it to see > + * if boot_params is copied or not. > + */ > + if (!boot_params.hdr.version) { > + copy_bootdata(__va(real_mode_data)); > + setup_early_console(); > + } > > memblock_init(); > Under what conditions would we *not* have gotten through x86_64_start_kernel()? -hpa