From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: sbp2: parallelize login/inquiry, reconnect, and shutdown
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:50:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB467A3.4010200@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tkrat.1386de42b88d7218@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Hello,
On 10/11/2010 11:27 PM, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Hmmm... from glancing the code, there doesn't seem to anything which
>> can guarantee sbp2_release_target/reconnect() are finished before
>> sbp2_cleanup() returns, so the code section might go away with code
>> still running. It seems like the right thing to do here would be
>> using alloc_workqueue(KBUILD_MODNAME, WQ_NON_REENTRANT, 0). Am I
>> missing something?
>
> There are indeed situations where the last module reference was already
> put down before the work is run for the last time. Thanks for the hint.
>
> What is preferable, an own workqueue instance whose destroy_workqueue()
> lets sbp2_cleanup wait for unfinished work, or module ref-counting like
> below?
The best would be flushing the specific works but that isn't possible
when works are used to do the final put. I would go for using a
separate workqueue. With cmwq, each workqueue is much cheaper than
before anyway.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-12 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-10 14:55 [PATCH] firewire: core: use non-reentrant workqueue where necessary Stefan Richter
2010-10-10 14:57 ` [PATCH] firewire: sbp2: parallelize login/inquiry, reconnect, and shutdown Stefan Richter
2010-10-11 13:43 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-11 21:27 ` Stefan Richter
2010-10-11 21:39 ` Stefan Richter
2010-10-12 13:55 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-12 16:15 ` Stefan Richter
2010-10-12 16:46 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-12 13:50 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-10-12 21:39 ` [PATCH unfinished update] " Stefan Richter
2010-10-12 22:25 ` Stefan Richter
2010-10-12 23:09 ` Stefan Richter
2010-10-13 9:45 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-11 13:29 ` [PATCH] firewire: core: use non-reentrant workqueue where necessary Tejun Heo
2010-10-11 19:05 ` Stefan Richter
2010-10-12 21:29 ` [PATCH update] firewire: core: use non-reentrant workqueue with rescuer Stefan Richter
2010-10-13 9:47 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB467A3.4010200@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox