From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: allocate skbs on local node
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:36:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB5537E.30906@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010122330090.13748@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> I think Christoph is saying that we'd remove SLAB and make the unified
>> allocator the new SLAB while keeping SLUB in place.
On 10/13/10 9:31 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
>> Right, so his unification patches would be against slab instead of slub
>> which is a pretty major change from the current state of the patchset,
>> although it might actually be smaller?
No, the way I understood it was:
rm mm/slab.c
cp mm/slub.c mm/slab.c
<apply patches on top of slab.c>
Pekka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-13 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1286838210.30423.128.camel@edumazet-laptop>
[not found] ` <1286839363.30423.130.camel@edumazet-laptop>
[not found] ` <1286859925.30423.184.camel@edumazet-laptop>
[not found] ` <20101011230322.f0f6dd47.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <1286866699.30423.234.camel@edumazet-laptop>
[not found] ` <20101012002435.f51f2c0e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <1286869793.2732.24.camel@edumazet-laptop>
[not found] ` <20101012005856.994bea6d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2010-10-12 11:08 ` [PATCH net-next] net: allocate skbs on local node Pekka Enberg
2010-10-12 12:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-12 19:43 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-13 6:17 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-13 6:31 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-13 6:36 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2010-10-13 16:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-13 20:48 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-13 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-13 22:41 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-14 6:22 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-14 7:23 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-15 14:23 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB5537E.30906@kernel.org \
--to=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eilong@broadcom.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox