From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755293Ab0JNPjc (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:39:32 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:59341 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754576Ab0JNPjb (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:39:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4CB7240E.9000905@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:38:54 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Rientjes CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Casey Dahlin , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] x86: allow ZONE_DMA to be configurable References: <4CB64D8F.9080800@zytor.com> <4CB65262.3070507@zytor.com> <4CB688F4.9040706@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/13/2010 09:46 PM, David Rientjes wrote: > > I'm not running a CONFIG_EMBEDDED kernel and I'm pretty sure Casey isn't > either, so we'd still need to carry our own patches to change the Kconfig > bool line anyway. > > I'm suprised that we can't allow users who definitively know that they > have no hardware limitations the ability to disable ZONE_DMA. Would a > strong caution in the Kconfig "help" text suffice or will you not be > convinced? CONFIG_EMBEDDED *is* "I am a user who (think I) know what I'm doing". That is *what it is* and *all it is*. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.