From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755780Ab0JNUCK (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:02:10 -0400 Received: from mail.digium.com ([216.207.245.2]:37810 "EHLO mail.digium.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754185Ab0JNUCJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:02:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4CB76166.5050504@digium.com> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:00:38 -0500 From: Shaun Ruffell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100907 Fedora/3.0.7-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Venkatesh Pallipadi CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Proper kernel irq time accounting -v4 References: <1286237003-12406-1-git-send-email-venki@google.com> <4CB72BF3.4030601@digium.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/14/2010 01:19 PM, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote: > So, with this patchset you should see task CPU% showing only the exec > runtime of the task and not si time. With the upcoming change the CPU > times would get fixed as well. I am planning to send out the > "exporting through /proc/stat patchset" as incremental change once > this patchset gets into tip/next.... That is what I was looking for. I didn't know if you were thinking about using /proc/stat or some other mechanism. I'll look forward to seeing/testing that patch. Thanks again, Shaun