From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754732Ab0JOLcp (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2010 07:32:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57148 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752203Ab0JOLco (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2010 07:32:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4CB83BCD.4090507@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:32:29 +0200 From: Jerome Marchand User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091014 Fedora/3.0-2.8.b4.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Matthew Wilcox , Pavel Emelyanov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v3] procfs: fix numbering in /proc/locks References: <4CA484BA.7090809@redhat.com> <4CAB1693.2080301@redhat.com> <20101007162702.7db08f5b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20101007162702.7db08f5b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The lock number in /proc/locks (first field) is implemented by a counter (private field of struct seq_file) which is incremented at each call of locks_show() and reset to 1 in locks_start() whatever the offset is. It should be reset according to the actual position in the list. Moreover, locks_show() can be called twice to print a single line thus skipping a number. The counter should be incremented in locks_next(). And last, pos is a loff_t, which can be bigger than a pointer, so we don't use the pointer as an integer anymore, and allocate a loff_t instead. Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand --- locks.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index ab24d49..767ef8e 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -2085,7 +2085,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfs_cancel_lock); #include static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl, - int id, char *pfx) + loff_t id, char *pfx) { struct inode *inode = NULL; unsigned int fl_pid; @@ -2098,7 +2098,7 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl, if (fl->fl_file != NULL) inode = fl->fl_file->f_path.dentry->d_inode; - seq_printf(f, "%d:%s ", id, pfx); + seq_printf(f, "%lld:%s ", id, pfx); if (IS_POSIX(fl)) { seq_printf(f, "%6s %s ", (fl->fl_flags & FL_ACCESS) ? "ACCESS" : "POSIX ", @@ -2161,24 +2161,27 @@ static int locks_show(struct seq_file *f, void *v) fl = list_entry(v, struct file_lock, fl_link); - lock_get_status(f, fl, (long)f->private, ""); + lock_get_status(f, fl, *((loff_t *)f->private), ""); list_for_each_entry(bfl, &fl->fl_block, fl_block) - lock_get_status(f, bfl, (long)f->private, " ->"); + lock_get_status(f, bfl, *((loff_t *)f->private), " ->"); - f->private++; return 0; } static void *locks_start(struct seq_file *f, loff_t *pos) { + loff_t *p = f->private; + lock_kernel(); - f->private = (void *)1; + *p = (*pos + 1); return seq_list_start(&file_lock_list, *pos); } static void *locks_next(struct seq_file *f, void *v, loff_t *pos) { + loff_t *p = f->private; + ++*p; return seq_list_next(v, &file_lock_list, pos); } @@ -2196,14 +2199,14 @@ static const struct seq_operations locks_seq_operations = { static int locks_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) { - return seq_open(filp, &locks_seq_operations); + return seq_open_private(filp, &locks_seq_operations, sizeof(loff_t)); } static const struct file_operations proc_locks_operations = { .open = locks_open, .read = seq_read, .llseek = seq_lseek, - .release = seq_release, + .release = seq_release_private, }; static int __init proc_locks_init(void)