From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] workqueue: remove in_workqueue_context()
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:48:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB869CC.7070800@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100923171019.GD2406@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 09/23/2010 07:10 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:35:07PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Commit a25909a4 (lockdep: Add an in_workqueue_context() lockdep-based
>> test function) added in_workqueue_context() but there hasn't been any
>> in-kernel user and the lockdep annotation in workqueue is scheduled to
>> change. Remove the unused function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Paul, I was looking through lockdep annotations to see how they can be
>> improved and noticed that in_workqueue_context() isn't used by anyone
>> and it seems like there hasn't been any in-kernel user either. Can
>> this be removed or do you expect to use it somewhere?
>
> I added it for the drivers/vhost changes. They were using a
> variant of RCU where executing in workqueue context acted as an RCU
> read-side critical section and where flushing workqueues acted as
> an RCU grace period. The in_workqueue_context() was then passed to
> rcu_dereference_check() to verify correct usage.
>
> But you are right, I don't see it being used any more, though I do still
> see the big block comment documenting this in drivers/vhost/vhost.h.
>
> Michael, what are Tejun and I missing here?
Ping. Shall I go forward with this patch?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-15 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-23 12:35 [PATCH RFC] workqueue: remove in_workqueue_context() Tejun Heo
2010-09-23 17:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-10-15 14:48 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-10-19 9:27 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB869CC.7070800@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).