public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] rcu,cleanup: move synchronize_sched_expedited() out of sched.c
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:56:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CBD4F48.9070804@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)


The first version of synchronize_sched_expedited() use the migration code
of the scheduler code, so it have to be implemented in sched.c

but now, the synchronize_sched_expedited() does not use such code,
it is time to move it out of sched.c.

Different rcu implementation' synchronize_sched_expedited() are also
different. so we move synchronize_sched_expedited() to kernel/rcu{tree,tiny}_plugin.h
instead of kerenl/rcupdate.c

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 rcutiny_plugin.h |    6 ++++
 rcutree_plugin.h |   71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 sched.c          |   69 -----------------------------------------------------
 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
index 6ceca4f..87e226c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
@@ -461,6 +461,12 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
 
+void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
+{
+	barrier();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched_expedited);
+
 static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
 static unsigned long sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count;
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 71a4147..9e62b01 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
 
 /*
  * Check the RCU kernel configuration parameters and print informative
@@ -581,6 +582,76 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
+
+void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
+{
+	barrier();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched_expedited);
+
+#else /* #ifndef CONFIG_SMP */
+
+static atomic_t synchronize_sched_expedited_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+
+static int synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop(void *data)
+{
+	/*
+	 * There must be a full memory barrier on each affected CPU
+	 * between the time that try_stop_cpus() is called and the
+	 * time that it returns.
+	 *
+	 * In the current initial implementation of cpu_stop, the
+	 * above condition is already met when the control reaches
+	 * this point and the following smp_mb() is not strictly
+	 * necessary.  Do smp_mb() anyway for documentation and
+	 * robustness against future implementation changes.
+	 */
+	smp_mb(); /* See above comment block. */
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Wait for an rcu-sched grace period to elapse, but use "big hammer"
+ * approach to force grace period to end quickly.  This consumes
+ * significant time on all CPUs, and is thus not recommended for
+ * any sort of common-case code.
+ *
+ * Note that it is illegal to call this function while holding any
+ * lock that is acquired by a CPU-hotplug notifier.  Failing to
+ * observe this restriction will result in deadlock.
+ */
+void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
+{
+	int snap, trycount = 0;
+
+	smp_mb();  /* ensure prior mod happens before capturing snap. */
+	snap = atomic_read(&synchronize_sched_expedited_count) + 1;
+	get_online_cpus();
+	while (try_stop_cpus(cpu_online_mask,
+			     synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop,
+			     NULL) == -EAGAIN) {
+		put_online_cpus();
+		if (trycount++ < 10)
+			udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
+		else {
+			synchronize_sched();
+			return;
+		}
+		if (atomic_read(&synchronize_sched_expedited_count) - snap > 0) {
+			smp_mb(); /* ensure test happens before caller kfree */
+			return;
+		}
+		get_online_cpus();
+	}
+	atomic_inc(&synchronize_sched_expedited_count);
+	smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* ensure post-GP actions seen after GP. */
+	put_online_cpus();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched_expedited);
+
+#endif /* #else #ifndef CONFIG_SMP */
+
 static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
 static long sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count;
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex);
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index abf8440..9dc7775 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -9332,72 +9332,3 @@ struct cgroup_subsys cpuacct_subsys = {
 };
 #endif	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT */
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
-
-void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
-{
-	barrier();
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched_expedited);
-
-#else /* #ifndef CONFIG_SMP */
-
-static atomic_t synchronize_sched_expedited_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
-
-static int synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop(void *data)
-{
-	/*
-	 * There must be a full memory barrier on each affected CPU
-	 * between the time that try_stop_cpus() is called and the
-	 * time that it returns.
-	 *
-	 * In the current initial implementation of cpu_stop, the
-	 * above condition is already met when the control reaches
-	 * this point and the following smp_mb() is not strictly
-	 * necessary.  Do smp_mb() anyway for documentation and
-	 * robustness against future implementation changes.
-	 */
-	smp_mb(); /* See above comment block. */
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * Wait for an rcu-sched grace period to elapse, but use "big hammer"
- * approach to force grace period to end quickly.  This consumes
- * significant time on all CPUs, and is thus not recommended for
- * any sort of common-case code.
- *
- * Note that it is illegal to call this function while holding any
- * lock that is acquired by a CPU-hotplug notifier.  Failing to
- * observe this restriction will result in deadlock.
- */
-void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
-{
-	int snap, trycount = 0;
-
-	smp_mb();  /* ensure prior mod happens before capturing snap. */
-	snap = atomic_read(&synchronize_sched_expedited_count) + 1;
-	get_online_cpus();
-	while (try_stop_cpus(cpu_online_mask,
-			     synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop,
-			     NULL) == -EAGAIN) {
-		put_online_cpus();
-		if (trycount++ < 10)
-			udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
-		else {
-			synchronize_sched();
-			return;
-		}
-		if (atomic_read(&synchronize_sched_expedited_count) - snap > 0) {
-			smp_mb(); /* ensure test happens before caller kfree */
-			return;
-		}
-		get_online_cpus();
-	}
-	atomic_inc(&synchronize_sched_expedited_count);
-	smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* ensure post-GP actions seen after GP. */
-	put_online_cpus();
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched_expedited);
-
-#endif /* #else #ifndef CONFIG_SMP */

             reply	other threads:[~2010-10-19  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-19  7:56 Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2010-10-19 17:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] rcu,cleanup: move synchronize_sched_expedited() out of sched.c Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CBD4F48.9070804@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox