From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:55:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CBD871C.2080900@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101019114933.GA857@redhat.com>
On 2010-10-19 13:49, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:01:40PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2010-10-19 11:10, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> gcc 4.5 complains when compiling a recent rc with
>>>
>>> linux/block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ‘cfq_dispatch_requests’:
>>> linux/block/cfq-iosched.c:2156:3: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
>>>
>>> and it is right:
>>>
>>> slice = group_slice * count /
>>> max_t(unsigned, cfqg->busy_queues_avg[cfqd->serving_prio],
>>> cfq_group_busy_queues_wl(cfqd->serving_prio, cfqd, cfqg));
>>>
>>> busy_queues_avg can be indexed by this enum
>>>
>>> enum wl_prio_t {
>>> BE_WORKLOAD = 0,
>>> RT_WORKLOAD = 1,
>>> IDLE_WORKLOAD = 2,
>>> };
>>>
>>> in cfqd->serving_prio, but is only declared as
>>>
>>> unsigned int busy_queues_avg[2];
>>>
>>> which is clearly off by one. Fix this here.
>>
>> Indeed, that is definitely buggy. ->service_trees[][] looks buggy, too.
>> WTF?!
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> busy_queues_avg[] definitely looks buggy. Looks like I introduced this bug
> while converting corrado's logic to group logic. I will fix it in a while.
> Sorry for the goof up here.
>
> ->service_trees[][] is not buggy. We maintain workload subclassification
> only for RT and BE class. For IDLE class, there are no ASYNC_WORKLOAD,
> SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD or SYNC_WORKLOAD. All the type of idle queues
> go onto a separate service tree, service_tree_idle.
Right, that one looks convoluted (but correct). Ugh:
#define for_each_cfqg_st(cfqg, i, j, st) \
for (i = 0; i <= IDLE_WORKLOAD; i++) \
for (j = 0, st = i < IDLE_WORKLOAD ? &cfqg->service_trees[i][j]\
: &cfqg->service_tree_idle; \
(i < IDLE_WORKLOAD && j <= SYNC_WORKLOAD) || \
(i == IDLE_WORKLOAD && j == 0); \
j++, st = i < IDLE_WORKLOAD ? \
&cfqg->service_trees[i][j]: NULL) \
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-19 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-19 9:10 [PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ Andi Kleen
2010-10-19 10:01 ` Jens Axboe
2010-10-19 11:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-10-19 11:55 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-10-19 12:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-10-19 13:23 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-19 15:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-10-21 16:53 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-10-21 17:16 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-21 17:15 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CBD871C.2080900@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox