From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757911Ab0JTDsw (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:48:52 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:57158 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757361Ab0JTDsv (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:48:51 -0400 Message-ID: <4CBE6791.9040402@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:52:49 +0800 From: Lai Jiangshan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com CC: Ingo Molnar , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rcu,cleanup: simplify the code when cpu is dying References: <4CBD4F56.2000601@cn.fujitsu.com> <20101019183216.GC2362@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20101019183216.GC2362@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/20/2010 02:32 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > rsp->n_force_qs, rsp->n_force_qs_ngp, > rsp->n_force_qs - rsp->n_force_qs_ngp, > - rsp->n_force_qs_lh); > + rsp->n_force_qs_lh, rsp->orphan_qlen); > for (rnp = &rsp->node[0]; rnp - &rsp->node[0] < NUM_RCU_NODES; rnp++) { > if (rnp->level != level) { > seq_puts(m, "\n"); > > rsp->orphan_qlen is still removed in new patch, is it a big problem for users who trace rcu by these files?